Debate Insights, Political Divides, and the Intensifying Election Race: The Zogby Report Analyzes the Presidential Debate

In a recent edition of The Zogby Report: Real and Unscripted, John and Jeremy Zogby analyzed a pivotal presidential debate. John Zogby commended Kamala Harris for her commanding stage presence and composed demeanor. However, he pointed out that she avoided addressing critical issues like the economy and fracking, which are particularly important to voters in Pennsylvania. While her calmness was evident, her reluctance to engage on these topics was seen as a missed opportunity.

John also observed that Harris employed a prosecutorial approach to critique Trump but didn’t create any standout moments. On the other hand, Trump was notably aggressive throughout the debate, often appearing displeased. Though he made some impactful remarks, including questioning Harris’ record, some of his more dramatic statements were disproven during the debate.

Jeremy Zogby offered a broader view, noting that the candidates represent the deep political divide in the nation. He emphasized that each candidate embodies a sharply contrasting and divisive vision for America. Both Zogbys concurred that the debate did not lead to significant changes in the campaign dynamics, though Harris might have gained a slight advantage.

They concluded that the election remains intensely competitive, with no clear frontrunner emerging. They anticipate the race will become even more heated, reflecting the deep political and cultural divides among voters.

John and Jeremy Zogby continue to influence the realm of political polling and research through their firm, John Zogby Strategies, which focuses on online focus groups and opinion polling analysis. Jeremy’s recent work, including polling at Robert F. Kennedy’s campaign events and research into American views on heroism during the pandemic, has attracted notable media coverage, including a feature in The New Yorker.